首页> 外文OA文献 >Using a Rapid Appraisal Approach in a Nationwide, Multisite Public Involvement Study in Scotland
【2h】

Using a Rapid Appraisal Approach in a Nationwide, Multisite Public Involvement Study in Scotland

机译:在苏格兰进行的全国性多场所公众参与研究中使用快速评估方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article reflects on the use of a multisite rapid appraisal (RA) approach with reference to the (to-date) largest qualitative study gathering the views of cancer and cancer care in a cross-section of the Scottish population. A series of ten RAs were conducted in ten communities across Scotland, reflecting the geographical and socioeconomic spread of the Scottish population and involving 507 members of the public, including the views of people who are often termed "hard to reach." The research method is evaluated with reference to principles of RA approaches: the inductive approach, triangulation, assessment and response, and participation. Presentation of the methods adopted in this study demonstrates the value of the rapid appraisal approach in engaging with members of the public in health-related issues, which belies the "quick and dirty" reputation of RA approaches and offers a model for future public involvement work in health care. This makes the reflections on the method utilized particularly relevant to policy makers and researchers wishing to achieve meaningful public involvement and/or consider a method not previously used in this context.
机译:本文反映了对多站点快速评估(RA)方法的使用,并参考了(迄今为止)最大的定性研究,该研究收集了苏格兰人群中有关癌症和癌症治疗的观点。在苏格兰的十个社区中进行了一系列的十次RA,反映了苏格兰人口的地理和社会经济分布,共有507名公众参与,其中包括通常被称为“难以到达”的人们的观点。该研究方法是根据RA方法的原理进行评估的:归纳方法,三角剖分,评估和响应以及参与。这项研究中采用的方法的介绍证明了快速评估方法与公众参与健康相关问题的价值,这掩盖了RA方法的“快速而肮脏”的声誉,并为未来的公众参与工作提供了模型在卫生保健中。这使得对所使用方法的思考与希望实现有意义的公众参与和/或考虑以前在此背景下未使用的方法的决策者和研究人员特别相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号